Who Is Jesus of Nazareth?
(Chapter 9)
But if we don’t say that Jesus
is divine, how do we explain his central importance for us as Christians?
Most of the traditional titles for
Jesus do not work for many of us today.
“Savior”
is too tied to the theory of divine blood satisfaction.
“Lord
and Master” belong to a different age, and they also encourage “triumphalism,” not Christian servanthood.
The “Messiah”
was to be a conquering warrior-king -- which Jesus was not.
“Son of God” means too many different things to different people.
But if I cannot ascribe to these
traditional titles, who do I say that Jesus is?
I proclaim Jesus of Nazareth as
“the Christ.” Because we think of this as his second name, it is
less burdened with traditional meanings.
By calling Jesus “the Christ,”
I don’t mean that he is divine, or that has a special “being” or “nature.”
Rather, I mean that he fulfills
the role for us of focus and guide to our understanding of God and reality and how we should live.
Thus, I proclaim
Jesus as the “functional Christ.” (See the next chapter.)
Jesus
as the (Functional) Christ: Indisputable, Sufficient, and Sacred (Chapter 10)
If we consciously make Jesus of
Nazareth the focal point of our life, the source of our deepest values, then he functions as the Christ for us. This does not depend on his having a divine nature.
To claim him as our focus, and form
our lives accordingly, indisputably gives him this function for us.
To claim that Jesus was right, to
say that he provides the answers to our deepest questions and the focus of our faith, is sufficient
because it is the most that can possibly be claimed for another. (It is not
claiming more for Jesus to describe in a way that uses high-sounding language but makes no sense.)
And Jesus
as the functional Christ fulfills a sacred role for us, as the focus through which
we form our relationship with God.